ENGINEERING CASE STUDY

Manufacturing Tooling & Depot Process Improvement

Practical additive-manufactured tooling and sustainment support at Fleet Readiness Center Southwest, connecting shop needs to manufacturable solutions.

Industrial Engineering Workforce Development Rotation · February 13 – August 13, 2026

~$140KProjected tool-tracing savings
50Nylon masking plugs produced
~$177AM material cost for 50 buckets
Conceptual engineering illustration, not actual project documentation or evidence
Original conceptual illustration. Not an actual part, test setup, or controlled engineering drawing.

Engineering challenge

Support depot manufacturing needs through tooling development, additive manufacturing request management, and practical alternatives to purchased or temporarily unavailable shop items.

Constraints

The work involved manufacturing feasibility, material and delivery estimates, fit-check coordination, and labor/material/print-time tracking. Commercial blast-shop conveyor buckets were temporarily unavailable. Tool-tracing savings were projected for a portion of the shop floor, not the entire depot.

My contribution

I designed, scanned, printed, and installed tool-tracing inserts. I also developed nylon masking plugs for an E-2D launch bar and supported production of 50 blast-shop conveyor buckets. These were distinct efforts during the same rotation; the projected savings figure applies specifically to the tool-tracing initiative.

Methods & tools

  • Design, scanning, additive manufacturing, and installation of tool-tracing inserts.
  • AM Portal request management from intake through closeout: feasibility, estimates, design uploads, fit checks, and tracking.
  • Nylon masking-plug development and testing.
  • Manufacturing cost comparison for additively manufactured conveyor buckets.

Verification

The résumé records installation of the tool-tracing inserts and successful testing of the nylon masking plugs. It attributes the approximately $140,000 savings projection to a Manufacturing Branch Head, compared with purchased and laser-cut foam methods. The detailed cost-model assumptions, labor allocation, and realized financial results are not provided.

Engineering outcomes

Tool tracing: approximately $140,000 in savings projected by a Manufacturing Branch Head for a portion of the shop floor; not reported as realized savings.

Masking plugs: successful testing released work delayed about two weeks, followed by production of 50 plugs in approximately 36 hours.

Conveyor buckets: supported production of 50 buckets for approximately $177 in AM material, compared with more than $825 before shipping and taxes for commercial replacements. This compares material cost with purchase price and is not a complete lifecycle-cost calculation.

Additional sustainment work: designed and tested a two-piece nylon arresting-hook shank mold; reviewed LM2500 engineering requests, measurement reports, physical components, technical-manual limits, repair options, inventory, and Bill of Materials data.

Lessons & applications

This rotation connected design and manufacturing decisions to fit, delivery, configuration control, cost, and readiness. The financial lesson is equally important: distinguish projected savings, material-only costs, and full realized costs when communicating engineering impact.

Related skills

Manufacturing toolingDesign for additive manufacturingTooling / fixture designCost comparisonNaval aviation sustainmentConfiguration controlDepot engineering

SOURCE & SCOPE

Based on the existing published portfolio and supplied résumé. This page is a public, high-level summary; it does not include raw test data, proprietary technical documents, or program-specific requirements.

Explore related work

NEXT CHAPTER

Let's engineer
what's next.

Discuss engineering opportunities, explore related work, or take a closer look at my professional background.